Bus error: Jake Billo's weblog

As per the main WordPress site, another upgrade has hit. The security fix refers to our wonderful friend, xmlrpc.php. I highly suggest disabling this file (just delete it from your WordPress directory) if you’re maintaining a locked down installation of WordPress. This file seems to be present in every security issue lately, and a brief scan of the source seems to indicate that it offers support for pinging update services, sending pingbacks and allowing remote control of the service – none of these features are generally critical for sites valuing security more than blogosphere wankery.

DreamHost doesn’t seem to be offering the official upgrade yet, so I’m just downloading the fixed xmlrpc.php file for my installations requiring it, and replacing the file until the one-click install option comes online.

The big news today (well, yesterday by the time this goes live) was that Windows Vista SP1 had released to manufacturing. Annoyingly enough, this doesn’t mean it’s available for public download yet, and end users will have to wait until in mid-March from Windows Update, or mid-April through Automatic Updates. I’ll keep my eye out for a validated copy from sources with access to the original MSDN files, because SP1 allegedly fixes some of the network copy issues I’ve been having recently.

As background, the network copy issues seem to involve Vista’s auto network tuning utility. I have a gigabit Ethernet connection between my Windows Home Server box and my primary Core2Quad system, and get about 40-50MB/s read speed without tweaking them using XP SP2 or Leopard clients. Vista, on the same Core2Quad and a 10K RPM Raptor drive, taps out at about 9MB/s and is often much slower than that, which is incredibly painful when working with 4+GB MKV files.

SP1 releases, at least with recent Microsoft products, have heralded new standards of stability and less crashiness. (SP2 really went above and beyond in fulfilling this role for XP, but it was an exception since it added additional security capabilities.)

The more interesting post of the day, though, is from Mark Russinovich’s blog in which he discusses the lower-level details of file copy operations. It’s definitely worth a read if you’re of the computer science mindset, and goes a long way to explaining some of the more intricate changes to Vista SP1.

With the release of the Xbox 360 ‘Fall’ Update, MPEG-4 ASP support (commonly known as DivX or XviD support) has been added to the integrated video player.

The primary missing feature is the ability to play high-definition H.264/x264 MKV streams. While H264 support was added in the previous Dashboard upgrade, unfortunately, the decoding implementation isn’t perfect: the dashboard doesn’t natively read MKV. As well, high definition files can only contain a 2-channel AAC soundtrack, not full 5.1+ surround. This prevents using the Xbox 360 for most H264 content available on the Internet.

There is still a way to view HD content (with 2 channel sound) on the Xbox 360: transcoding the audio track and repackaging the MKV file into a MP4 container. This process takes significantly less time than converting both video and audio, and the visual quality is maintained. You do lose the additional 3.1 channels, but it’s better than having to install a Core 2 Duo E6750 under your TV just to play these files.

For a while, AAC recoding has been somewhat of an arcane art, known only to those who’ve spent years looking on the Doom9 forums. I’d looked into this a few months ago and wasn’t too impressed with the available solutions. Skimming the Xbox 360 information thread from the Something Awful forums today, though, I found a solution that should work for people prepared to install a few free utilities.

Getting Set Up for Encoding
You’ll need a few free utilities to get your system in the best shape possible for repackaging the MKV contents into an MP4 container. Here’s the sequence I followed on a fresh XP installation:

• Download and install the newest version of CCCP, which includes a stable version of ffdshow and Haali Media Splitter. A new edition was released on January 24, 2008 so I’d advise an upgrade if you’re running something older.

• Download and install AC3Filter, which is a good utility to have anyway if you’re planning on listening to 5.1 audio or outputting optical/coaxial audio from your sound card.

• Download a copy of Nero AAC Encoder and extract the contents of the win32 folder where you can find them later. If you use the package I provide below, the files are already included.

The Magical Tool of Whimsy
The tool that makes Xbox playback possible is called GOTSent, which boasts “easy and fast x264 .MKV to PS3 and XBOX 360 compatible MP4 and PS3 compatible VOB/AC3 conversion.” It’s essentially a wrapper around several open source video encoding utilities, but it certainly does the job as intended. The current version is 0.23B10, which has been mostly stable in my experience. Make sure you’ve already downloaded and installed Nero AAC Encoder, CCCP and AC3Filter before grabbing this file.

Before You Begin: AC3Filter Gain Level
In my experience, the AAC audio in the newly muxed file is at a significantly lower level than most non-HD sources, so you may have to increase your volume to properly watch the videos on the Xbox 360. The more permanent way to solve this issue, though, is adjusting the gain control in AC3Filter. These instructions assume you’ve installed the newest CCCP and AC3Filter already.

• Start the original H.264 video file that you’d like to convert in Windows Media Player, Media Player Classic, Zoom Player, or any other player that uses DirectShow media filters. (Most players except VLC fall into this category.)

• In your system tray, right-click the red FFDshow icon – highlighted in yellow in the following image. Select AC3Filter from the popup menu.
  

• In the AC3Filter dialog, slide the Gain slider up until the sound from the original video file matches your normal system sound or MP3 volume. Try seeking to a loud section of the video to get a good idea of where this setting should be. I needed a fairly hefty boost on my system (which has onboard Intel HD-compatible sound to standard stereo out, on an Asus P5B Deluxe motherboard) of about +16.6dB to match standard iTunes output, but going any higher resulted in clipping and distorted sound.As you adjust the slider, you should immediately hear the difference in the video file. Ideally, make this setting as close to 0dB as you can tolerate to avoid distortion. Looking at the input levels equalizer may also help in determining the right setting.

Once you’ve selected your gain level, click OK and close the current video file.

GOTSent Tips and Tricks
You’ll definitely need to use the “Split >4GB option” so that the Xbox recognizes the output files, and try converting one file at a time to get a general idea of how the process works. I’ve been able to avoid using the MPEG2 Recode, Safe Sync, Mux to Vob (PS3) and 25 FPS options, so leaving them unchecked should work.

Once the GOTSent process is done, rename the output file to Filename.avi – while the Xbox 360 should detect the original .mp4 extension from Zune or Windows Media Player 11 sharing, Windows Home Server standard media sharing requires .avi extensions for the files to be properly seen. Add the faux-AVI files to your video library as usual, and you should be up and running watching HD content from your Xbox 360.

Caveats and Setbacks
Not all files I’ve found will work with GOTSent, but it’s certainly got a high level of compatibility with exotic downloads. For example, certain x264 HDTV files simply cause GOTSent to chew up CPU and refuse to enter the demuxing phase of the job. You can tell if this is the case, because a command prompt window appears in the tray during the first step GOTSent takes.

It appears as if all the tools included with GOTSent are single-threaded and Win32 binaries; for those of you with high end 64-bit systems intending on taking advantage of extra CPU cores, there’s not too much optimization coming your way with the utility. You’ll still be able to perform normal computing tasks while the program works, though, so not all is lost.

I’m looking forward to any new updates and fixes for this program, and will keep you informed as to any developments I’m aware of. sentry23 (the original author) has done a great service releasing this tool and it’s certainly sped up the process of converting files for me.

I’m currently reinstalling XP Pro on my main system in preparation for some upcoming video editing work, and I’m just getting used to certain tweaks I have to perform. The most common offenders that eat up screen real estate and menu placement are the Office 2007 extensions for OneNote – Open as Notebook in OneNote and Groove Folder Sharing, which appear in certain context menus. I also remove the 7-Zip folder extension and cascade the WinRAR compression options.

To get rid of the Groove menu, which places itself nearly everywhere you might possibly right-click, it’s easiest just to uninstall the program from Add/Remove Programs if you’re not using it. Browse for the Office installation in the list:

Select the Change button, then in the next dialog, choose Add or Remove Features, then click Continue. Beside Microsoft Office Groove, click the dropdown menu and select “Not Available.” Complete the setup process and the menu will cease to appear.

If you want to remove the Groove menu without removing the Groove application itself, this forum post gives a description of the registry keys where you can find and remove the Groove entries. For posterity, they are:

HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\*\shellex\ContextMenuHandlers
HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Folder\shellex\ContextMenuHandlers
HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Directory\shellex\ContextMenuHandlers
HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Directory\Background\shellex\ContextMenuHandlers
HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\AllFilesystemObjects\shellex\ContextMenuHandlers

Getting rid of the OneNote context menu item involves removing the following registry key (as mentioned in the comments on Daniel Escapa’s blog:

HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Directory\shell\OneNote.Open

You could take the same approach as mentioned for Groove by completely removing OneNote from the Office 2007 installation, but I actually use OneNote on a regular basis and want to keep it around.

7-Zip is much easier to deal with. Just launch the 7-Zip File Manager, then click Tools / Options. Navigate to the Plugins tab and click the Options button:

Deselect the “Integrate 7-Zip to shell context menu” checkbox, then OK out of the option boxes and close 7-Zip.

Finally, WinRAR has a similar removal method: start the program, then click Options / Settings. Under the Integration tab, uncheck “Integrate WinRAR into shell”, or if you prefer a single-item entry in the context menu, check the “Cascaded context menus” box.

You can also reduce the number of items displayed in the menu by exploring the “Context menu items” dialog. For example, I generally remove the “Compress and email” options since I switch email clients fairly regularly.

Once done, OK out of the settings dialogs and exit WinRAR. You’ll have a much cleaner context menu to work with.

Edit: Fixed a registry path and removed a blockquote tag.

I experience this issue every time I go to seek a pre-Windows Vista driver for an Asus motherboard: their download servers always peter out at about 100KB/s, regardless of which mirror I choose. I have half a mind to set up mirrors of the most popular drivers – even if a LAN or audio driver isn’t necessarily the latest version, it’ll still help people get up and running sooner rather than later.

nVidia and ATI have persistently fast download speeds, even for the size of their respective driver suites. It’s just the motherboard and chipset manufacturers that have this problem. I recall waiting for a 4KB/s download from an audio chip manufacturer because nobody else had the right drivers.

Build it in to the cost of your high-end products if needed. I’m sure the people buying “gamer edition” motherboards, who are the ones updating their BIOS weekly and wasting time asking technical support about how to overclock their RAM and set unsupported timings, should be shouldering the cost. I just like to have drivers available and at fast download speeds when I need them.

It’s time for one of my favourite angry posts on the Social Utility That Could.

Facebook recently announced a new developer policy for applications publishing content to the Mini-Feed (which filter up to the global News Feed depending on quality.) The News Feed is the default page upon login, while the Mini-Feed is the area on your own profile, where people can see the recent things you’ve been up to – like changing your “Looking For” status to “Random play.” I no longer have the “random play” option myself; apparently at some point in the past, my employment or affiliation with the IBM or RIM networks triggered a flag that says that since I’ve worked for the man, I apparently no longer can openly advertise my desire to engage in non-committal, promiscuous activities.

Either that, or it read my “Male at the University of Waterloo” details, and summarily decided that my interests could not possibly contain meaningless, playful contact with the opposite sex. I’m amazed I wasn’t forced into looking for “like-minded friends who enjoy a spot of anime, ramen noodles and debating .999=1.” Instead of “random play”, I have to settle for the much less scandalous “networking” option, which my good friend Phil promptly mocked:

Networking is now an option in looking for?! Christ what’re you gonna do walk up to a chick and be like “hay can i interface w/ ur data p0rt lol if u get wut i mean kekeke”

I would not be surprised if someone at UW has actually tried this as a pickup line, although a much more likely attempt would involve LOLcats or the ORLY owl.

The long and short of this new Facebook policy is that applications can no longer report passive actions, such as users receiving new posts on their installation of SuperFunLuckyHappyWall. (Now with bonus Zwinky!) Observe:

Rather, the new policy indicates that only actions taken by a user should be published. So if you posted a new Happycat using Internet Meme Generator 2.0, then it’d be fair game to see “Jake posted a new Happycat image macro” in the Mini-Feed. This should hopefully help clear up the state of items such as “Forty-seven (47) of your friends sent a Wet Willy to one another.” Facebook’s not naming names, but the two biggest offenders are Slide and RockYou. It should be a bit more pleasant to see things cleaned up.

As an aside, you can still find my favourite applications to block if you’re interested in improving your experience.

Lil’ Mama has been usurped, and the new contender for worst song in the world is one by DeAndre Ramone Way (no, I’m not joking – his real name is DeAndre), in which listeners are instructed thusly:

Soulja Boy off in this hoe
Watch me crank it
Watch me roll
Watch me crank that Soulja Boy
Then superman that hoe
Now watch me YOUUUUUUUUU
(crank that Soulja Boy)

Then later on, after we’ve heard the steel pan backing track for a while, we continue the exploitation of women for entertainment. Why hasn’t someone gotten offended about this and made a big public stink?

I’m jocking on your bitch ass
And if we get to fighting
Then I’m cocking on your bitch ass

This only serves to reinforce that the Urban Dictionary definitions of “superman” are indeed what DeAndre is referring to.

(Note: I actually had to search for a good ten minutes, and then edit significantly, in an effort to bring you lyrics that Weren’t Written Like This, Because The Target Audience Of This Song Capitalizes Every Word. It’s The Same Audience That Thinks The Future Of Technology Is “I Can Watch YouTube On My Cell Phone And Download Ringtones.”)

Entertainment Weekly describes the album, which is actually titled Souljaboytellem.com:

”Crank That” is diverting enough for three and a half minutes, but most of his debut, Souljaboytellem.com, is a teenage wasteland filled with monotonously looped chants and agonizing blunt-force beats. At least he owns a cool domain name. D

What’s even more ridiculous than the song? Watching the obligatory meta-tastic music video on YouTube, which is like looking into an M.C. Escher illustration: it involves a record executive looking at Soulja Boy’s music video on a simulated YouTube site. Yes, thank you! People watch videos online! I don’t need to see a frame and five stars and a faux progress bar to know this.

If you’re actually going to listen to this song, check out the Kosha Boy remix (there’s even the Fiddler on the Roof!)

And while musicians lament the state of the industry, where ringtones are the target market, Soulja Boy has the following to say:

“When I did my album, I went into the studio (thinking), ’I gotta have each song on here where it will be good as a single,”’ he says. “I believe I came out with an album full of singles, so I’m good.”

I received an interesting marketing-type email from a Brian from Box.net today, promoting their Facebook application. Ordinarily, I’d ask “why would anyone have the nerve to drop me a message at 6:40 AM on a Friday, other than to tell me my download queue completed?” and “do you know what I usually have to say about Facebook applications, let alone annoying or idiot ones?”

I haven’t written a scathing Web 2.0 review since my Customerforce piece for an intern there; since then it looks like CustomerForce has gone under significant plastic-ification and drastically changed its focus to “social media enabler”. It’d be a perfect story for Uncov, but that’s a different piece for a different time.

I’ll slightly modify part of a comment from my original post on Customerforce, as a preface to how I review Web2 services.

If I can describe your complete business plan in a few lines of PHP and SQL, then it’s not a sound business plan at all. You can’t have a business plan that relies on “SELECT `movie` FROM `topmovies` ORDER BY `votes` LIMIT 5;”. Some sites rely on users contributing the best aggregated content, and then having other friends of these users voting on it. It’s too many steps for the average MySpace click-copy-paste profile whore. Never underestimate the stupidity of users; and never underestimate the concept of “less is more.”

So, does Box.net fall into this category? Short answer: no, but it’s certainly heavy on the Web 2.0 fluff that’s so common these days with anything reviewed by Robert Scoble. Interestingly enough, Scoble just reviewed (read: promoted) the service. Company-wide marketing blitz perhaps?

In any event, someone else will have to tell me what Robert said; I refuse to give into The Streaming Flash Video Service That Could, And Perhaps It Works From My Cellphone of the week when a download link (or even a YouTube video) would suffice. Protip, everyone: Choosing a non-standard place to dump your content does not make you a special and unique snowflake.

What Does It Do, Johnny?
Box.net is a cross between sites like RapidShare and products in the Google Docs suite. Essentially, it’s a file upload utility with granular access permissions. It also has several notable API hooks to connect to other Web 2.0 services, and connect your documents and media to them. They claim traffic of over one million file downloads per day. It sounds like a perfect recipe for a crafty frontend to Amazon’s S3 Storage, or perhaps outsourcing traffic to LimeLight Networks for content delivery.

LimeLight tends to be pricey for startups, and throwing around files online costs real cash money. You also have to have a certain amount of capital around to deal with the inevitable copyright lawsuits and DMCA lawyering that result when people don’t read the terms of service and upload their hastily-obtained copy of Harry Potter And The Order Of The Phoenix[2007]DvDrip[Eng]-aXXo so that “they can watch it at work.”

Something for Nothing: Trickier than Getting Free RealPlayer
Unlike most other Web 2.0 services, Box.net doesn’t rely on users being tricked into clicking on Google Ads. This is probably a good thing, because all the ads would probably key on competing services given the site’s ridiculous attempt at search engine optimization:

Box.net - Free Online File Storage, Internet File Sharing, Online Storage, Access Documents & Files Anywhere, Backup Data, Send Files
This is their title tag. Way to make it a great default bookmark name.

Going directly to their site, you’ve got a clear “signup” button:

This, as any savvy Web user knows, is a dangerous trap into somehow getting something you don’t want at all. All good sites make the interesting or free stuff hidden in a link inside a paragraph of dull gray text. I’ll save you the disappointment here, though, and spoil things: the narrator and Tyler Durden are the same person, and Box.net has no publically available free service. Your options are respectively 14-day trials for a 2GB/$25/year account; a 5GB/$80/year account; or a 15GB/$200/year account.

Wait – that’s not entirely correct and complete. There are at least two other types of accounts. Signing up for a trial of the 2GB account gave me a billing profile with a 1.0GB BASIC option. What if I’d wanted to try a Plus, Premium or Business account, and not the Cheapskate Special?

But hey! I can upgrade my account right now if I give them my credit card number, as I’m constantly and nauseatingly reminded as I flip through their interface. It’s inescapable. Uploading a file? Look at an advertisement for additional services. On the home page? Fully one quarter of the UI is dedicated to “give us some money, please.”

File Uploads Aren’t Bad
There’s a reasonably snappy interface for file uploads, which gives a progress bar and filesize information. The multi-file Java applet also suits the purpose well. It’s also reasonably easy to share (make public) files as hyperlinks, although directly pointing to them is restricted to premium accounts.

It also appears as if downloads go through an “index.php”-style redirector before being deployed to the browser, presumably for access control and database categorization. Sort of weak not being able to access the actual file directly, but that’s a minor point.

What I’d like to see: for video uploads, embed a YouTube-style FLV player on the Download page so that potential users can preview the file. Hell, even an EMBED tag, done tastefully, would let the end user’s browser try to stream the content.

Overall, I’m actually quite impressed with the file upload functionality.

Integration is Quite Good
I do actually endeavour to test services before panning them, so I uploaded several photos and tried the “Edit photos” application. If anything, this convinced me that before I pay Box.net $25 per year, I should pay Picnik the same amount for premium Web-based photo editing. Their Flash utility for managing photos is really well designed and could easily replace all of the low-end photo editing utilities currently on the market.

If the only negative “well, that’s weak” thing I can find is the above message on replacing an unsaved document, then I would vote these guys the next Google acquisition target.

Unfortunately, I can’t say the same about the integration of Zoho Writer. (It’s the “Create Document” option.) The new browser window suffers from the same FAIL as Ted mentioned on Uncov, and this wasn’t even the spreadsheet that can’t deal with 620KB of data. The following font is NOT Arial.

You Said There Were At Least Two Account Options =\
The Facebook application for Box.net offers yet another way to score some free storage, although in a creepy viral marketing “send invites” way. If you want an untethered free account from the start, this may be the way to go. You get 20MB, plus 20MB for each additional friend you invite to the application, probably up to an arbitrary limit (Update 12/29/07: up to 1GB, which would mean you’d have to invite 50 friends to get the full storage. Thanks, Fred.)

There’s also a way to score a year of a premium 2GB account, although it involves completing a “special offer” that will likely ruin your credit rating and sign you up for Video Professor.

It’s essentially a giant Flash blob when integrated though, and for someone running NoScript, the Facebook component looks like this:

Unfortunately, the revealed version is a horrible mélange of Arial, Times New Roman and imitation Zuckerberg styling. It seems to follow no design rules. Did nobody actually test the application on a Mac running Safari? The main box.net website works properly.

Social Interaction: Does It Spam?
More than zero friends on a Facebook developer test account were needed in order to test out the invitation feature and newsfeed functionality. I found that Facebook fails it too when creating a new account:

The invitation process is fairly informative, so you’ll probably only get invites from people who actually want to share files rather than spew Glitter Text all over your wall. Here’s what the invite looks like:

True to form, the promised storage upgrade works properly, but then fails all over itself when it comes to sharing folders with other users. Shared folder notifications take you completely out of the Facebook UI, instead of linking to the grammatically-incorrect “My Friend’s Files” page. There’s also a duplicate notification dropped each time you share a folder or file.

From a Technical Point: FTP Makes Sense
One of the more convoluted pages on the Box site deals with FTP. I assume it’s targeted at managers and monkey-suit type individuals who have heard that the protocol is “a good way to share files.” As far as I can tell, the only mention of the free 1GB account is on this page:

Box.net offers a free 1GB storage account that you may use for as long as you like. If you are interested in trying one of our pay accounts, you are welcome to try any of them free for 14 days.

FTP is a standard protocol for a reason, guys. I’d love nothing more than SFTP or SCP access to my Box.net account; that way I could upload files regardless of what platform or environment I’m using.

Summary: The Facebook App Fails It; The Main Site Doesn’t
I guess Brian’s intention with his email was to drum up traffic for the Box.net Facebook application. In short, it’s a failure: it looks ugly from the Times New Roman embedded font, seems to unnecessarily use Flash, and doesn’t support any of the external publishing/platform providers that make the main Box.net more worthwhile.

Would it be that hard to write a Facebook application using a canvas IFRAME and then apply a custom stylesheet based on the source? (Answer: No. I’ve written them.) It also sprays a disgusting SWF on your user profile, whereas a plaintext list of files with links would be much more effective and not require the initial “click to display” barrier.

Fixing it would be reasonably easy, though. Stick to HTML and JavaScript within Facebook. If not possible in Facebook’s implementation of FBJS, use an IFRAME; and maintain consistency across user interfaces. What’s with the 20MB initial cap on Facebook accounts, when the official site gives 1GB? And furthermore, why can’t I switch my accounts easily from my profile, receiving the login failure message above?

I feel for the Facebook developers that have to wade through the comments and reviews though. Idiots that want an “autoplay my MP3zzzz” option should be unceremoniously shot.

I probably wouldn’t block the application with malice, simply by virtue of testing it out, but it’ll have to be improved somewhat before I allow it access to my real Facebook profile.

Box.net, though, as a separate service, might just replace my tested method of creating new drafts from Gmail and attaching files. It’ll be much easier to drop files there for transferring, and with third party integration for services like Picnik, I expect additional interesting ways to work with files in the future.

I got a chance today to update my Yahoo Pipes RSS feeds to reduce some of the content I look at.

Digg Stupidity Filter (run pipe) removes idiotic stories from the general Digg news feed. Specifically, these stories tend to include Ron Paul, marijuana, Mike Huckabee, and meta-stories about Digg itself. I’ve also added a few regular expressions; stories containing all capital letters or repeated punctuation marks (“!!” and “…” come to mind) generally aren’t worth the read.

The Onion (No A/V Content) (run pipe) takes The Onion’s RSS feed and removes all tagged stories with audio or video content.

If you like these ideas, please feel free to check out the rest of my published Pipes. What also has helped my newsreading lately is creating folders in Google Reader, and grouping similar blogs (Engadget and Gizmodo, and Kotaku and Joystiq for example) into meta-categories “Gadgets” and “Video Games”.

I’ve discussed the holy grail of pixel mapping for the Sony E2000-series LCD projection televisions before. With the latest nVidia drivers on Vista, I believe I’ve found the most practical solution to this issue.

First, it’s notable that even using the HDMI inputs, 1:1 pixel mapping doesn’t seem easily attainable from a PC. While the native resolution of this particular TV is indeed 720p (1280×720, progressive), there is still a significant amount of overscan to account for.

My particular solution involves setting two display resolutions. The first is a 1:1 (or approximate) pixel mapped image when at the Windows desktop, set at 1152×648. This resolution is automatically detected in the Windows Display control panel and nVidia resolution list when connected with a DVI to HDMI cable. The second is a full 720p image while in Windows Media Center, which can have its own resolution detected independently:

To set up this type of display mapping, first install the latest nVidia drivers. Once installed, you should have an nVidia Control Panel option when right-clicking the desktop. Use “Advanced Mode” if prompted.

• In Windows or the nVidia control panel, change your display resolution to 1280×720.
• In the nVidia control panel applet, there should be a new “Resize HDTV Desktop” setting at the bottom of the tree view. Select this option.

• The right panel contains a frame for the “Resize my HDTV Desktop” option. Click this option, then click the Resize Desktop button.

• When resizing the desktop, size it so that the arrows are slightly outside your HDTV display area. I find that putting the arrowheads offscreen (so that only the bottom parts of the arrows display) is the best setting.

• Close the resize desktop dialog and click OK (if available) in the nVidia control panel. Open the Display control panel again and change the resolution to 1152×648.
• You should now be able to see all desktop contents, in a 1:1 or close to 1:1 display. Try adjusting TV display settings, if possible, to improve the display quality.
• When ready, start Windows Media Center and run the Display wizard. Select 720p resolution. Media Center will automatically correct for some overscan.
• Try playing a high definition, 720p or higher video. If there are black borders surrounding the video, you’ll need to close Media Center and repeat this process, but increase the desktop resizing correction. When Media Center closes, verify that your resolution returns to a standard 1152×648 so that the Start Menu and desktop are completely visible.

It might not be a perfect solution, but it’s a significant step up from previous solutions involving third party utilities. Did it work for you, or do you have any other suggestions? Let me know in the comments.