Marketing in action: Matchstick sends out a Zune

While I may not go as in-depth as Anand might or post with the furious pace common to Gizmodo authors, I enjoy reviewing new technology purchases from a few different perspectives. As a Computer Science student, tech is interesting because it’s a practical application of concepts such as linked lists and binary trees and software architecture - and how most of those concepts get thrown out the window in order to ship on time.

From a business perspective, having firsthand experience with some of the same devices our clients use is helpful from a support angle. It also determines whether we’ll recommend them to end users. I’ve had great experiences with Asus mainboards, and every system I quote includes one - the (potentially) reduced cost of going with something else is not worth the extra aggravation it causes.

And then there’s the geek who talks about RAID-5 controllers just because they’re awesome.

Free Zune, And It’s Not A Pyramid Scam?

SmartCanucks is a regular visit from my feed reader, and they’d posted an article about qualifying for a free MP3 player. Unlike most “free stuff” contests and promotional offers online, everything from SmartCanucks will be applicable to Canadians in some form. Further intrigue ensued when commenters suggested it wasn’t the traditional $20 low-end Shuffle device, but a Microsoft Zune player.

I’d heard about the Zune launching in Canada recently and had played around with one in March for a few minutes, during at an Infusion Angels conference in the Accelerator Centre. It seemed to have a nice UI, but it’s hard to judge when you’re already being inundated with the distinctly Microsoft flavour of the building and presenter. (The XNA conference was very entertaining, for the record, and very encouraging for third party developers.)

After applying through the online survey, I received a call a few days later from Matchstick asking some followup questions. Most of them were repeated from the original survey, but I expect the representative was checking for consistency; one of the biggest problems in obtaining statistics is making sure the interviewees don’t contradict themselves. Some other questions were intended to get a baseline for my pre-existing opinions about Microsoft, and I was also asked if I’d review the product on my site or other social networking connections.

When the question period was finished, I was told that I qualified to receive an 8GB Zune package and that I’d get the option to send one to a friend or recommend another user.

Since I just received the device on the 24th, the next few weeks will be interesting as I properly put the Zune through its paces and try the wireless functionality, as well as provide some technical details on the software. To give it a fair shake, I’ll use it in real-life situations before making a judgement call. I’ll be reviewing the hardware, software and online social service in separate articles over the next month or so, giving people the chance to add their own comments.

Above is the only obligatory image of the unit. There are already dozens of “unboxing” posts online - if you’re into that sort of thing, check out these other sites:

The Marketing Effort

For now, it’s probably worthwhile to talk about how the Matchstick (and ChatThreads) process is tinged with just enough marketing effort.

Let’s get one thing straight, though: a large number of people participating in this type of marketing effort go to great lengths to whinge on a certain subject. Namely, is accepting merchandise as part of a promotion ethical? There are dozens of posts from Matchstick’s Nokia 6682 efforts to this effect, with the gamut of predictable, tired reactions ranging from “I got an awesome phone for free!” to “these spammers killed my dog.”

I’m sick of this debate. Disclosing where you got the product is a significant part of the review process, and established press organizations have done this for years. If you don’t disclose your connections, you’re an astroturfer - in other words, the same as the company behind AllIWantForXmasIsAPSP.

Furthermore, being solicited for marketing campaigns is part of maintaining a reasonably popular site. How many press releases do you think Engadget receives daily? I actively sought out this opportunity, so I can’t make the same claim - but those who can’t seem to work out the “ignore” function in their email client or respond with a polite “no” need to seriously reconsider operating a website.

For this promotion, Matchstick has partnered with a company in the States called ChatThreads. Their purpose is to collect word of mouth responses and correlate them with online activity, and they deliver a set of cards as well as seek feedback though their website. Each card has a Conversation ID that links the original campaign, authorized end user, and the collected personal information.

Before receiving the Zune, ChatThreads sent an email asking me to sign up for their site, containing some interesting requests:

As part of your participation you will be sharing your feedback and conversations about Zuneâ„¢ with ChatThreads, an independent word of mouth research company working with Matchstick.

Each time you have a conversation about Zuneâ„¢ tell us about it at ChatThreads.com/zune. The conversations you tell us about could be face-to-face, over the phone, or online.

If you’d like to see exactly what the end-user survey entails, hit up ChatThreads’ site and enter the Conversation ID 102 986 0195. You’re all my friends!

My initial reaction to the page was that I certainly did not agree to provide email addresses every time I mentioned Zune to people. Even documenting conversations wouldn’t really be a problem - but signing people up for an email message looking like this is not something I’d be thrilled to try repeatedly. At least the “Providing this information is optional.” message at the bottom is present.

Another oddity involves the terms of use adorning the ChatThreads sweepstakes. As a thanks for completing the ChatThreads survey, you can opt to have the company donate up to $5 to specific charities, or win up to $500 in Amazon gift certificates. Unfortunately, even as this entire marketing campaign is intended for Canadian residents, the sweepstakes terms restrict the potential winners to zero.

Eligibility. Open to legal residents of the United States (excluding Rhode Island, Puerto Rico and all other U.S. territories and possessions outside of the continental United States and where otherwise prohibited by law)

Conversely, ChatThreads’ past winners page indicates someone from Toronto as a previously successful winner. At the very least, this point should be updated or clarified before sending out what looks like more-expensive-than-average marketing collateral.

I’ll be forwarding this post to the Matchstick coordinators to get a definitive answer through ChatThreads, before promising contest entries to card recipients. Update July 4/08: See this post for ChatThreads’ response and the corrected sweepstakes rules.

Another interesting element in the pseudo-viral marketing strategy is the ability to recommend someone for a Zune device. The signup page for this process required a weblog URL, regular visitor count and number of friends on a social network:

These requirements really discouraged a technologically adept friend of mine. While he’s active in online social networking, he doesn’t currently host an independent blog. The solution was to have him link his Facebook profile page - the “I just got a free Zune! It’s awesome!” status messages through Facebook are perhaps even better publicity from a marketing perspective than a series of posts.

What’s Next?

I’m interested in how Matchstick continues to follow up on this effort. The welcome letter indicated that there were more email messages and additional promotion possibilities in the future. Hopefully this post gives a bit of firsthand insight into the background process.

What can other companies and future marketing campaigns learn from what Matchstick and Microsoft did?

The good:

  • Don’t set terms and conditions other than what’s needed for your target market. I never felt pressured to say anything “good” about the product, which is a better way of getting feedback than three hundred faux-positive MySpace comments.
  • Attract technology-focused individuals. They’re more likely to be the recommenders and drivers of product adoption.
  • Make it easy for people to get involved. Don’t single out people arriving from high-traffic sources: these are the people you want talking about your product.

The not-as-good:

  • Try not to spam anybody who’s already expressed a lack of interest. With a Microsoft product especially, there are serious detractors in the Google search results already and they’re not as concerned about being offered a Zune, as they are with being offered a Zune.It’s always challenging to manage email campaigns. When working for Maplesoft - I did my best to ensure the programs marketing folks didn’t blast people that had already unsubscribed. (I can’t vouch for what they’re doing now, but I hope my email utility still has a good home.)
  • Get all your terms and conditions lined up, especially when using external agencies. If people start finding inconsistencies in the fine print then they might start to wonder exactly how professionally the program is managed.
  • Don’t assume that everyone manages a weblog or website. This may have been a specific target of the campaign, but some people are just as effective when posting to Facebook or other social networks. Keep the regular user - who isn’t necessarily a content producer - in mind too!

Your thoughts will help shape the upcoming reviews. What are you interested in hearing about - the service? Integration with other utilities? Metadata tagging and support for network shares within the software? Speak your piece in the comments and I’ll get on it!

Update, July 4/08:

This post is the first in the Zune review series. I received the device for free as part of a Matchstick promotion. My goal is to provide a technically engaging and impartial review for people interested in MP3 players. Other posts include:

17 Comments

  1. Sally:

    What an in depth article on the Zune and Matchstick, I really enjoyed reading this, very informative!
    Im still playing around with mine… I feel kind of silly but theres no off button is there? I am assuming it auto shuts off ;)

  2. Jake Billo:

    Hold down Play/Pause to put it into “sleep” mode manually - it’s sort of like the iPod in that respect in that there’s no fully off mode.

    By the way, thanks for the initial post on SmartCanucks. I’m really into tech reviews and it was awesome when things just worked out with Matchstick.

    Still more to come here as I review the software and device itself. The 2.5 software is actually a neat package, I’m running it in a virtual machine on my Mac right now to really put it through its paces. A few other computer science guys and myself will probably have all the quirks figured out soon! :)

  3. Adam:

    Funny - the Matchstick guy e-mailed/called me up well over a month ago asking if I’d be interested in getting involved, and after wasting my time on the phone they never even sent me anything.

    They initially wanted me to feature it on Dear Toronto (video site that I collaborate on with Ryan Couldrey & Rebecca Black) but I refused since it has nothing to do with Toronto. I said that I’d be willing to write about it on my personal blog though.

    Guess they didn’t like my answers about perception of the Microsoft brand? I can only assume why they didn’t send it, but the guy on the phone seemed really worried about people posting negative comments about Matchstick. Obviously my experience with them doesn’t really give me a favorable opinion of the company though.

    Another thing - I made it crystal clear to him that I would be writing my thoughts on the device without any reservation, so if it was crap, I would say that. Did I scare them off? He said something along the lines of ‘well of course we’d be happier if you have good things to say about it, but that’s cool’

    Whatever. I’ll stick with my iPhone.

  4. Sally:

    Maybe there looking for people who appreciate the microsoft brand and arent assuming a negative response?

    I was told to write freely wether it was negative or positive, they arent forcing you to write that you like it. This program wasn’t really to review Matchstick as a company but to review the Zune.

  5. Adam:

    To say that you’re going to get authentic opinions about a product when you’re only catering to people who ‘appreciate the Microsoft brand’ is laughable. I don’t even know how you qualify a statement like that; I don’t mind Microsoft’s products, but I’m not their biggest fan either. Does that mean I appreciate it?

    The reality of the situation is that at least 80% of people have white earbuds in their ears, and Microsoft isn’t going to gain any traction there by marketing to people who are into the brand. You’ve got to be competitive and differentiate yourself with a great product and a great experience using it.

    I’m well aware the program wasn’t to review Matchstick, but Jake writes about sites like Engadget receiving tons of press releases and products to review. Surely the companies sending those out to them have a vested interest in making sure they actually receive them. Matchstick has their own brand image to worry about, and this is their business, so if I have a negative experience with them I’m not going to hold back in talking about it either if that’s what I feel like doing.

    It’s not *my* job to chase down a company that wants me to generate buzz about a product. At the end of the day, dollar for dollar, my opinion and reach within virtual (and non-virtual) social networks is worth far more than a $299 MP3 player. All I’m asking for is a little professionalism. Is that too much to ask for?

  6. Sally:

    Im not going to argue or debate with you, I find you rather bitter and maybe it was your additude that was the determining factor.
    If you re read my post to you was with a question mark. It wasnt a statement it was a question.

    Matchstick had a page where you applied, then they would call you and run more questions to determine if you qualified or not, I dont quite understand your first statement, were you led to believe that you were being sent one? Or were you told you did NOT qualify. If you didnt qualify then its as simple as that then, not everyone qualified when they phoned back. But if they did tell you you qualified and you never recieved anything then phone matchsitck to inquire about it.

    :)

  7. Sally:

    Jake:

    Thanks so much for letting me know about the sleep button, haha I felt so silly looking around for an off button. I look forward to reading your continued review and the quirks you find with it.

  8. Jake Billo:

    Maybe I can help defuse this a little bit - Adam was actually approached by the Matchstick folks; he didn’t apply through their site. They’ve had a two-tiered approach to their previous programs as well: first, they contact people with websites featuring keywords (like iPod and Zune) as well as popular city-based weblogs. In conjunction with this approach, they also set up a self-select questionnaire, which is how I received an invitation to participate.

    I had a completely opposite experience from Adam when it came to the phone call from Matchstick. I was told that they were looking for honest opinions about the product, good or bad. While I may seem optimistic in what I’ve written so far, I fully intend to blast some aspects of the software and service because they just don’t stack up - either to the competition or standalone.

    One of the qualifying questions was what my existing perception of Microsoft was. I can guarantee they had a “below X/10″ filter, because they don’t want to approach the people whose minds won’t be changed by a free MP3 player. It wouldn’t do well to send a promotional item to someone who believes that Gates is personally responsible for the downfall of Western society - and you have to look at that as just marketing and nothing personal.

    If you got the call, though, were you told you qualified? If so they should have sent one out. It might be worthwhile checking into that, but I can definitely see how you wouldn’t want to waste any more time.

  9. Andrew Rourke:

    Jake,

    I hope that you are well! You’ll be happy to know that your unsubscribe tool did have a looong life and was invaluable while we used it. We have since consolidated a number of systems and currently all lists, permissions, etc. are managed by a new tool. Nobody who has unsubscribed gets mail, and we only use opt-in lists. The ‘Global Unsubscribe’ list does still lives on, though! :)

    AR

  10. Jake Billo:

    Hi Andrew! Good to hear that the tool worked out for you as well as it did, for what started out as a side project at least.

    I know about all the effort you personally put in to make sure people didn’t get unsolicited messages, and how underappreciated that can be - especially when it came to professors who’d ignore the “unsubscribe” link and let the cursing fly in their reply to a campaign; and they’d turn around and sign up for the Adoption Program two weeks later. :)

    If you’re talking to the support folks in the near future, let them know I appreciated their quick response to a license reset request. Three minutes flat to have it fixed was awesome!

  11. Adam:

    So guess who just got a FedEx delivery sent yesterday? They’re heeeeeeeere! :)

  12. Sally:

    So you did get one afterall?

    Did you end up calling?

    Im glad you got it.

  13. Adam:

    I didn’t, it conveniently just arrived on its own :)

  14. Jake Billo:

    Interesting indeed… ;)

  15. Sally:

    Maybe they were just slow in shipping, or had some kind of delay? I know people that applied and got approved weeks after me had theres before I got mine. For example some of them the first day applied, second day got a call, then had them the next business day!!!!
    Insane!
    Hope you enjoy it!

  16. Jake Billo:

    Well, they’re definitely monitoring this post - I told them about it in an email, seeking a comment on the ChatThreads stuff. They’ve definitely seen it and might have picked up on Adam’s comments - that sort of thing does happen, especially on (I think) a reasonably positive post they might want to use as an example of “we did something right” when talking to clients. Can’t blame Matchstick if that’s the case, it’s just good business. :)

  17. Jon`s Zune Review Part 1 | Bus error: Jake Billo's weblog:

    [...] He received his device and has since written three parts of his overall review, available here, here and [...]

Leave a comment